<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philadelphia Social Media Marketing, Web Design, Internet Marketing and SEO &#187; Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/tag/search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 21:53:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#039;s Matt Cutts on the new Caffeine update</title>
		<link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/googles-matt-cutts-caffeine-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/googles-matt-cutts-caffeine-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Goldstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Caffeine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/?p=1836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newly, bald (he lost a bet with his team), Matt Cutts, Google&#8217;s search front man talked with WebProNew&#8217;s Mike Mcdonald about the Caffine Update. Caffeine is the code name for Google&#8217;s newest update to the seach giant&#8217;s search platform. Cutts says that they are doing their best to improve search without disrupting the existing rankings [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newly, bald (he lost a bet with his team), Matt Cutts, Google&#8217;s search front man talked with WebProNew&#8217;s Mike Mcdonald about the Caffine Update. Caffeine is the code name for Google&#8217;s newest update to the seach giant&#8217;s search platform. Cutts says that they are doing their best to improve search without disrupting the existing rankings in Google. He does say that there is always a chance of things changing though.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear what your thoughts are on the news hyper update to Google. Post your thoughts below in the comments.</p>
<p>The video:<br />
To place this video on your web site, copy/paste<br />
the following code into your HTML file:</p>
<div style="margin: 0px; padding: 4px 0px 0px 0px; width: 326px; height: 208px; text-align: center; border: solid 1px #000000; background: #D9D9D9 url(http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/video/embed-bg.gif) repeat-x left top; font: 14px 'Lucida Grande', Tahoma, Verdana, Times, serif;"><embed src='http://videos.webpronews.com/video/jwplayer/player.swf' width='316' height='188' allowscriptaccess='always' allowfullscreen='true' flashvars='config=http%3A%2F%2Fvideos.webpronews.com%2Fvideo%2Fjwplayer%2Fconfig.xml&#038;file=http%3A%2F%2Fvideos.webpronews.com%2Fvideo%2Fplaylist.php%3Fmovie_name%3Dses_mcutts'/><br /><a href="javascript:return false;" onclick="window.open('http://videos.webpronews.com/video/getcode.php?movie_name=ses_mcutts', 'Code', 'scrollbars,height=450,width=500')" class="right"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/video/video_embed.jpg" style="position: relative; z-index: 2; margin: 2px 5px 0px -55px;" align="right" border="0"></a><a href="http://videos.webpronews.com/" style="color: #003366; text-decoration: none;"><b>More WebProNews Videos</b></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/googles-matt-cutts-caffeine-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How SEOs spend their time, how it should be adjusted and why it isn&#039;t</title>
		<link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/find-the-right-seo-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/find-the-right-seo-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Goldstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get to the top of the search results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rank in the search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snake oil salesmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/?p=1786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand Fishkin over SEOMoz posted 4 great info graphs on Search Engine Optimization. One struck a chord: This pie chart shows where SEOs spend most of their time. I wasn&#8217;t surprised to see the results. A big part of any interactive venture falls into what I like to call &#8220;The Pitch.&#8221; Convincing people to part [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Fishkin over SEOMoz posted <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/4-essential-seo-infographics">4 great info graphs on Search Engine Optimization</a>. One struck a chord:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.seomoz.org/img/upload/how-seos-spend-time.gif" alt="How SEOs Spend Their Time - Infographic" width="466" height="522" /></p>
<p>This pie chart shows where SEOs spend most of their time. I wasn&#8217;t surprised to see the results.</p>
<p>A big part of any interactive venture falls into what I like to call &#8220;The Pitch.&#8221; Convincing people to part with their money is hard to do even if what they&#8217;ll spend it on will actually make them more money.</p>
<p>Many people who I talk to think SEO is a dark art and they don&#8217;t understand it. I always spend a good length of time explaining to them what goes into optimizing a site and why it costs what it does.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really sad when people look at the price quoted and immediately shut down. It&#8217;s obvious they weren&#8217;t expecting the price tag to be so high, but SEO isn&#8217;t something that just anyone can do. Many people claim to know how to SEO a site and many will have some success at it, but when it&#8217;s your bottom line at risk do you want to risk it with a fly-by-night operation or do you want to quality.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.negotiationtraining.com.au/images/resources/car-salesman.jpg" alt="philadelphia search engine optimization" width="216" height="205" /><strong>Beware of the &#8220;Snake Oil Salesmen&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>There are plenty of companies claiming to know how to get you to the top of Google. Many even say they can get you there in a short amount of time and you&#8217;ll stay there. Like in all industries there are the &#8220;snake oil salesmen.&#8221; These &#8220;experts&#8221; will tell you anything to get your money.</p>
<p>If one of these &#8220;SEO&#8221; gurus says that they can get you to the top of Google in a competitive keyword slot in less than 2 or 3 months (or even more) they aren&#8217;t legit. Also if they claim that SEO is a one time deal, walk away or hang up the phone, because If the keywords you&#8217;re after are in a competitive market there will always be another company in that space vying for your spot. If you&#8217;re not constantly tweaking your site and monitoring its position on the search results then you&#8217;re going to drop. Often times hard and fast.</p>
<p>Finding the right search engine optimization company is like finding the perfect contractor. There are tons out there but only a few gems. Do the proper leg-work and research the firm prior to doing business with them.</p>
<ul>
<li>Read their blog(s)</li>
<li>Google them and see where they come up in the standings</li>
<li>Check Twitter and see if anything is being said about them</li>
<li>Ask other business owners at events who they use</li>
<li>Search review engines like Local Pages and RateitAll</li>
</ul>
<p>If you follow these steps (and come up with your own as well) and you&#8217;ll be less likely to fall prey.</p>
<p><strong>Outsourcing to save money and why not to fall for the trap</strong></p>
<p>One of the biggest arguments  I hear when I pitch SEO to a client is, &#8220;I can go abroad and get this for three-quarters of what you&#8217;re charging.&#8221; This really gets my blood boiling. Yes you can go to India or some other place in Asia and get it done, but you are dealing with a number of factors that are going against your project. Here are just two big ones:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>The language barrier</em><br />
You might not think that this is a big issue, but it really is. It&#8217;s not so much the language as the customs and the idiosyncrasies of a different culture. When you deal state-side there is always a chance for miscommunication but it&#8217;s significantly lowe</li>
<li><em>You might not be legally protected while dealing with a company abroad<br />
</em>Now I&#8217;m not a lawyer, but I&#8217;ve heard horror stories from people who thought they&#8217;d save a buck and get their Website designed or optimized abroad. They would sign an agreement that looked okay, but in the end for whatever reason, the foreign company didn&#8217;t follow through with what they said they&#8217;d do and there was little  recourse for the American business owner. This can happen in America, but the legal structure that is in places gives you much more recourse than you would if you dealt internationally.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, I understand that money doesn&#8217;t grow on trees, but &#8220;you have to spend money to make money.&#8221; I know, I know it&#8217;s a cliche, but it really is true. Dealing with a company in the same country that you&#8217;re in makes communication easier and makes resolving disputes less painful. In the end isn&#8217;t it worth it to spend a little bit more but have the piece of mind that you&#8217;re going to get what you want? I think so.</p>
<p>If the SEOs spent less time having to justify their existence, maybe they&#8217;d be able to get their job done more effectively and the price might just go down a bit.</p>
<p>Post your thoughts below in the comments. I&#8217;d like to hear what you have to say about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/find-the-right-seo-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Market Forces and SEO how to rank well in the Search Engines</title>
		<link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/market-forces-and-seo-how-to-rank-well-in-the-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/market-forces-and-seo-how-to-rank-well-in-the-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Goldstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advetising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay per click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/market-forces-and-seo-how-to-rank-well-in-the-search-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand over at SEOMoz has another great Whiteboard Friday. This week he&#8217;s talking about how to organize your tactics to get your company competitive in the market place. Often times it&#8217;s not just Organic SEO but also PPC and Social Media Marketing. Check out the video below and post your thoughts in the comments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand over at SEOMoz has another great Whiteboard Friday. This week he&#8217;s talking about how to organize your tactics to get your company competitive in the market place. Often times it&#8217;s not just Organic SEO but also PPC and Social Media Marketing. Check out the video below and post your thoughts in the comments.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="300" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5632640&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="300" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5632640&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/market-forces-and-seo-how-to-rank-well-in-the-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which is Better CSS-based Layouts or Table-Based Layouts? Google&#039;s Matt Cutts says doesn&#039;t matter&#8230; but&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/which-is-better-css-based-layouts-or-table-based-layouts-googles-matt-cutts-says-doesnt-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/which-is-better-css-based-layouts-or-table-based-layouts-googles-matt-cutts-says-doesnt-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Goldstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css-layouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indexing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[table-layouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web page structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web structure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/?p=1136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts on the Google Webmaster Tools Help YouTube channel says that regardless of how you construct your site, either in a CSS-based layout or a Table-based layout, Google will be able to find and index your content. Please keep this in mind that Cutts says in the video that regardless of which way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 148px"><img src="http://blippitt.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/matt-cutts.jpg" alt="http://blippitt.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/matt-cutts.jpg" width="138" height="138" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Google&#39;s Matt Cutts</p></div>
<p>Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts on the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/GoogleWebmasterHelp">Google Webmaster Tools Help YouTube channel</a> says that regardless of how you construct your site, either in a CSS-based layout or a Table-based layout, Google will be able to find and index your content.</p>
<p>Please keep this in mind that Cutts says in the video that regardless of which way your site is built Google will &#8220;try&#8221; and index it. Now with CSS-based layouts your code is cleaner and less cluttered. It&#8217;s been proven that the more cluttered your site is with extraneous code the hard it is for your Website to be indexed.</p>
<p>So when Cutts says it doesn&#8217;t matter and Google will &#8220;try,&#8221; don&#8217;t you think the more adventagous thing to do would be code in such a way that makes it easier for search engine robots to spider your site? I think so. What do you think? Watch the video and post your comments!</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="580" height="360" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fL_GZwoC2uQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="580" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fL_GZwoC2uQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/which-is-better-css-based-layouts-or-table-based-layouts-googles-matt-cutts-says-doesnt-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Flash? There is no need to build a site in Flash</title>
		<link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/why-flash-there-is-no-need-to-build-a-site-in-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/why-flash-there-is-no-need-to-build-a-site-in-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Goldstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[find-ability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/?p=1071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe (formerly Macromedia) Flash is a great tool for interactivity and overall interaction. What it&#8217;s not good for is Web design. If you really, truly, want to get found on the Internet you don&#8217;t want your site in Flash. Yes, you can do really neat things with it. Make your cursor make sounds, have your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.roytanck.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/adobe_flash_logo.gif" alt="http://www.roytanck.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/adobe_flash_logo.gif" width="201" height="176" />Adobe (formerly Macromedia) Flash is a great tool for interactivity and overall interaction. What it&#8217;s not good for is Web design. If you really, truly, want to get found on the Internet you don&#8217;t want your site in Flash. Yes, you can do really neat things with it. Make your cursor make sounds, have your buttons animate in a way that CSS and xHTML just can&#8217;t, but you need to ask yourself two questions. First, do all these &#8220;flashy&#8221; (pardon the pun) effects do anything to promote your product or your company? Second, is it really worth giving up some Search Engine find-ability for a little unnecessary glitz and glamour? In my opinion, no.</p>
<p>There was a very interesting article in Search Engine Land blog yesterday. The author points out some very interesting points:</p>
<blockquote><p>But what about those that have a more basic Flash site that does indeed provide information? For them, I would ask, why Flash? If you dont need to allow your visitors to interact with your website, then why not just use HTML with Flash accents? Because even if the search engines are indexing the information contained in Flash (more on this in a bit), there are other reasons not to use it. First and foremost, not every browser has Flash installed. In fact, currently on an iPhone, Flash shows up as a little blue cube. Second, many Flash-based sites use only one URL for the entire site. Besides the search engine implications of that, it is also a nightmare for bookmarking, as well as for most web analytics programs.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://searchengineland.com/are-the-search-engines-really-indexing-flash-16942">Are The Search Engines Really Indexing Flash?</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>So I leave you with this, if your site does not need the wow power and interactive feel of Flash, but you want to capitalize on the search results, leave Flash for another day or another project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/why-flash-there-is-no-need-to-build-a-site-in-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

