<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philadelphia Social Media Marketing, Web Design, Internet Marketing and SEO &#187; paid posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/tag/paid-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 21:53:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Doesn&#039;t Like Paid Posts &#8211; Disclosure is key</title>
		<link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/google-paid-posts-disclosure-key/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/google-paid-posts-disclosure-key/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Goldstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sponsors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webpro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webpronews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/?p=1949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8216;ve seen this discussion happening across the Internet, in forums, on social media and on blogs. Paid posts, are they bad? Maybe. But how are they different from a radio talk show host giving his pitch for a sponsor of the show? Nothing really. Google&#8217;s new fight isn&#8217;t against spam, though I&#8217;m sure that fight [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I<img class="alignleft" src="http://www.getrichlazy.com/images/banker300px.jpg" alt="http://www.getrichlazy.com/images/banker300px.jpg" width="300" height="300" />&#8216;ve seen this discussion happening across the Internet, in forums, on social media and on blogs. Paid posts, are they bad? Maybe. But how are they different from a radio talk show host giving his pitch for a sponsor of the show? Nothing really. Google&#8217;s new fight isn&#8217;t against spam, though I&#8217;m sure that fight is still ongoing, it&#8217;s against bloggers who accept compensation for their posting positive reviews of the product without disclosure. Google sees this as a problem because the search giant&#8217;s algorithm relies heavily on links to and from sites for ranking purposes. If you as the blogger are pushing a product you aren&#8217;t providing unbiased value to the readers and to the Googlebot when you send a link to a sponsor.</p>
<p>Personally, if I review something, I do not promise a positive review. I promise a fair and unbiased view of the product and how it can or can&#8217;t benefit my readers. This is my own personal preference and I stand by it 100%. Other bloggers out there do accept paid sponsorships, and though I&#8217;m not a big fan, that&#8217;s their prerogative. I personally feel that bloggers need to find ways to pay the bills and if writing a PR post for a product or company helps in doing that, then all the more power to them. What I do have an issue with is the bloggers that don&#8217;t disclose what their plan is on their blog. They decide to accept compensation, but don&#8217;t alert people that it involves a kickback to them.</p>
<p>On the Goldstein Media blog, we have some relevant ads on our sidebar. We feel that these ads are relevant to our readers and don&#8217;t detract from the overall value of the blog. When a blogger hides affiliate links in their posts and writes complete fluff pieces for sponsors without alerting their readers to what they are doing. That is wrong.</p>
<p>Disclosure is key. WebProNews interviewed Michael Gray about this very topic:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/google-paid-posts-disclosure-key/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

